Delicious News, Not
It was not news. It was rumor.
Two days ago, I caught news of Yahoo announcing that the Delicious social bookmarking service is on a "sunset policy" and will be shut down. This was heavily circulated in the news and tweeted about in Twitter. Earlier this month, I began my Delicious experience and since then I have established a couple of months worth of bookmarks in Delicious. I was very upset by the announcement because I have a reliance on Delicious links and an RSS feed of those links through the icons illustrated below.
I immediately began looking for a replacement service. I did not want to go with the smaller players because they are subject to the same peril as Delicious which used to be supported by Yahoo. When I discovered that the Google Bookmarks service exists, I went in that direction. As it turns out, the Google Bookmarks service only supports private bookmarks whereas Delicious supports both private and public bookmarks. Because I use Delicious for its public bookmarking support, Google Bookmarks was not a replacement candidate.
There are various smaller players offering social bookmarking services with some charging for the service. I prefer a free service (as I am getting now with Delicious) and from a bigger player (if I am going to invest putting my bookmarks into another service, I want longevity).
Yesterday, news and Twitter tweets revealed that Yahoo has clarified their position with Delicious. True, Delicious is no longer a strategic fit at Yahoo and the service is on a "sunset policy" but Yahoo is re-assuring users to remain with Delicious as Yahoo is seeking a buyer to sustain the Delicious service.
As I discussed this Delicious plight with others, a couple of ideas surfaced:
- Google could buy Delicious
- Delicious could go open source
As a user wishing for Delicious to be backed and supported by a major player, Google buying Delicious is my preference. As a service, I want good performance and the Google server infrastructure is second to none. My main concern for Delicious going open source is twofold:
- I have seen open source projects go terribly wrong (granted Linux has been a great success on the server side).
- Server infrastructure is needed to provide Delicious as a service scaleable to the masses. Open source does not address that requirement.
Since Google has such massive purchasing power and they are in a buying mood, they should shore up their social networking portfolio in addition to releasing their Facebook-Killer - a "social layer" encompassing all Google products. See the following two pages for related mention of Google's competitive landscape:
The only thing that could stop Google from becoming the ultimate one-stop brand of all time is anti-trust laws. I have mixed feelings with anti-trust pressure on technology companies. I tend to side with the companies. In general, anti-trust lawsuits do nothing more than stifle innovation and advancement for the betterment of users. For the user, what did the anti-trust lawsuits against Microsoft achieve? There is no desktop O/S alternative. Microsoft's Internet Explorer would have been supplanted by superior browsers anyway. It did not require un-bundling from the Operating System for the truth to be known; better information and education to users/customers is all that is needed. If anti-trust goes after Google, it can only weaken Google whereas I want superior services to prevail.
2010 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr Jun Sep Oct Dec
2012 Jan Feb Apr May Jun Oct Nov Dec
2013 Jan Feb Mar May Jun Dec
2014 Jan Mar Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov Dec
2015 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Oct Nov Dec
2016 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2017 Jan Feb Apr Oct
2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr